Earlier this month, New Jersey’s Appellate Division reversed a trial court’s decision that had dismissed Robert Benning’s disability discrimination lawsuit because the trial court improperly ignored evidence which supported his claim. Mr. Benning is disabled. Specifically, he has cognitive impairment from an episode of cardiac arrest in 1984, which causes…
New Jersey Employment Lawyer Blog
Third Circuit Reinstates Police Officers’ Whistleblower Case
A recent case from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reinforces the fact that an employee who objects to something he reasonably believes violates the law does not have to be correct to be protected by New Jersey’s whistleblower law, the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (“CEPA”). Police Officers Anthony Galiazzi,…
Decision Based on Family Relationship is Not Ancestry Discrimination
Earlier this month, New Jersey’s Appellate Division recognized that New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”)’s prohibition against ancestry discrimination does not prevent employers from discriminating against an individual because he is related to another employee. In 2011, John Walsifer applied for one of two vacant positions as a police officer…
Employer Can Be Liable Based on Coworker’s Retaliatory Motive
A recent ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in a sexual harassment retaliation case holds that an employer can be liable if it negligently fires an employee due to the discriminatory or retaliatory animus of an employee who was not a supervisor. Andrea Vasquez worked for Empress Ambulance…
Employer Cannot Offset Unpaid Work with Voluntary Pay During Meals
A recent ruling from the United Stated Third Circuit Court of Appeals in a wage and hour lawsuit holds that an employer cannot use the fact that it voluntarily paid its employees during their lunch to offset periods when employees worked but were not paid. The Third Circuit is the…
Law Would Make it Illegal to Seek Job Candidate’s Salary History
A potential amendment to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) would make it illegal for employers to ask prospective employees about their wage and salary history before hiring them. The LAD is an anti-discrimination law that protects New Jersey employees from discrimination, harassment and related retaliation. Introduced last month…
Court Prohibits Employees from Violating Non-Compete Agreement
In a recent ruling in a non-compete agreement case, United Stated District Judge William J. Martini declined to lift an injunction prohibiting two former employees of ADP from soliciting the company’s clients on behalf of a competitor. Notably, however, the judge did not prohibit the employees from working for the…
Employer Can’t Fire Employee for Mistake Caused by its Failure to Accommodate his Disability
A New Jersey court recently ruled that a jury must determine whether an employer committed disability discrimination in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) by firing an employee for making a mistake on a day on which he had asked to be on a medical leave. Matthew…
NJ Supreme Court Makes it Harder to Reduce Emotional Distress Damages
Yesterday, in an employment discrimination case, the New Jersey Supreme Court dramatically limited the right of courts to reduce the amount of a jury’s emotional distress damages award, ruling that courts can only do so in unusual cases. The case was filed by two brothers, Ramon and Jeffrey Cuevas. The…
Objection to Customer’s Sexual Harassment Protected from Retaliation
The New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (“LAD”) prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who object to harassment in the workplace. A recent case recognizes that the LAD also protects employees who object to sexual harassment committed by a customer. Nicole Prager was a receptionist for Joyce Honda. One day, a…